ABOUT THE
FIRST thing one sees on arrival at Seoul’s hyper-modern
Incheon Airport after entry formalities is a screen
animation depicting the capital’s landmark
communications tower soaring over downtown Namsan Park,
as the city of 12 million sprawls beneath it.
At first
glance it looks like a tourist lure for Namsan’s scenic
cable-car ride through bucolic greenery overlooking
magnificent cityscapes.
Look
again.
The
animation reveals huge hairy hands – a metaphor for the
financial crisis – that suddenly begin tearing great
chunks out of Namsan. The tower starts to teeter, the
surrounding city is in chaos, and people are dying. It’s
as if the world is collapsing, the very foundations of
the country are being torn asunder.
But wait
– help is at hand in the form of Hyundai Capital, the
finance arm of one of South Korea’s biggest chaebols,
or conglomerates. And just as the tower begins to
topple, the friendlier hand of Hyundai reaches out to
stop the calamitous ensemble from descending to
disaster. Namsan’s foundations are quickly restored and
so, too, presumably, are the nation and its apparently
vulnerable wealth. The overly dramatic message is clear
– Hyundai Capital will be there to save you.
It’s all
a bit alarmist because, after clearing Incheon and
making one’s way through Seoul’s financial community,
it’s not at all obvious that South Korea’s once-brittle
financial and banking system requires saving, whether by
Hyundai Capital, the government or – as in the still
much-discussed financial crisis of the late 1990s that
virtually bankrupted the country – the IMF.
Although
South Korea is not quite in the pink of health – which
country is? – it certainly doesn’t feel as if it’s
troubled, in imminent danger of collapse or anything but
calmly seeing out the admittedly difficult times.
Indeed, far from wounded and retreating as many of their
US and European counterparts are, Korean banks are
busily promoting their prudent balance sheets and
cashing up with new international bond issues, including
some made of the similar DNA that went into the US
mortgage-backed securities that got us all into this
mess. Except that Korean covered bonds are anything but
sub-prime.
"The 1990s
crisis was a crisis of insolvency. But the
crisis Korea has today is not about insolvency,
it is liquidity. That means we are in much
better shape"
Professor
Lee Doo-won, Yonsei University’s School of
Economics |
"I’ve read about the
crisis here," says a bemused Jeroen Plag, the Dutchman
who heads ING Bank’s Korean operation. "But it’s not as
bad as what I hear from colleagues in London and New
York. They took the medicine here back in 1997/98, and
then there was the credit card crisis [2002/03]. The
government’s response to the current crisis has been
very sound so far."
David Edwards, chief
executive of Standard Chartered-owned SC First Bank,
agrees. "The crisis here is nothing like it was in the
1990s," he says. "There’s been a whole slew of measures
introduced and I think this is what is helping keep the
economy out of recession so far."
Make that
‘just out of recession’. Despite exports slumping 18% in
the first quarter of 2009, the world’s 12th-biggest
exporter posted economic growth of 0.1%. It’s a close
shave but Korean economists are surprised and rather
pleased that the economy grew at all. GDP growth, even
marginally measured, is something Korea’s fellow Asian
export economies like Taiwan, Japan and Singapore
couldn’t boast in Q1. The second quarter proved their
optimism; GDP jumped 2.3% in the three months to June
30, South Korea’s strongest quarter since Q4 2003. The
Korean government and its central Bank of Korea had
warned that the economy will contract this year for the
first time since the crisis in 1998, but six months in,
Koreans are holding on valiantly. Bars and restaurants
seem full, outwardly and anecdotally. Seoul seems lively
and there’s no sign of those terrifyingly hairy hands
over Namsan just yet.
Much
discussion among bankers and economists in Seoul
compares the impact of this current crisis to the Asian
contagion that crippled Korea a decade ago and forced
the country to embrace a humiliating IMF bailout. But
this time it’s different. Professor Lee Doo-won of
Yonsei University’s School of Economics notes: "The
1990s crisis was a crisis of insolvency. The banking
sector and the corporate sector then had a debt that
could not be paid back without the help of the IMF. But
the crisis Korea has today is not about insolvency, it
is liquidity. That means we are in much better shape."
|
North Korean leader
Kim Jong-il’s illness has added an element of
instability to relations for Seoul |
Indeed, there’s very
little of the concern among Koreans about the economy
that one divines in stricken economies elsewhere. Of
more concern to the 50 million population are the ICBMs
lurking among the 24 million of their brainwashed
cousins just 45 kilometres to Seoul’s north. These
missiles point across their troubled peninsula towards
Japan and Alaska and as far east as Hawaii in the
mid-Pacific. Koreans are used to northern bellicosity
but reports that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il may be
dying of cancer have added a wrinkle. After two
generations of Kim’s communist dynasty to the north,
South Koreans feel it’s better the wacky devil they know
in charge of the North’s nuclear suitcase than the
unpredictable unknown they haven’t met.
South Koreans are
sanguine about their economy because, compared with the
catastrophe that engulfed them during the late 1990s,
this crisis is a relative ripple. Much of South Korea
was bankrupted in 1997/98. In each quarter of 1998, the
economy contracted an average 6.65%. The Korean won
weakened 25% against the US dollar last year; during
1997/98 it fell 60%.
All about
exports
It’s all
about exports, and that means it’s mostly about China.
Professor Lee notes that Korean exports fell less
sharply during the first quarter this year than those of
competing exporters. Year on year, Korean exports fell
by 35% in January and 18% in February. It was savage but
not as severe as Japan’s 48% slump and China’s 25%
decline in February. Lee attributes that "relatively
mild" decline to Korea Inc’s stronger market position in
developing markets less affected by the financial
crisis. Since the first quarter, he says, exports have
risen encouragingly to these less-developed markets,
where Korean goods are priced as more prestigious than
mass-market Chinese-made goods but not as expensively as
western imports. He means neighbouring China, which, he
says, will save South Korea. China is now Korea’s
biggest export market and is buffering the Korean
decline. Lee expects Chinese growth to come in at around
8% this year, better than most western forecasts. "Korea
will enjoy the biggest benefit of this growth among
China’s trade partners," he says.
This
closer-up impact of the China factor has prompted
various analysts to revise their forecasts of Korean GDP
in 2009. The central Bank of Korea had originally tipped
a 3.3% decline this year – it has now revised that to a
2.9% decline. Likewise Goldman Sachs – from a 4.5%
decline to a 1.7% slump – and UBS too, which had
forecast a 5% decline at the beginning of 2009 but now
expects a 3.4% fall. The Korean finance minister, Yoon
Jeung Hyun, has said he expects a decline of 2% in 2009.
Yonsei’s Professor Lee says: "I think we have hit the
bottom. Under the bottom there is a basement but I don’t
think we will have to go there."
Korea has
been a good play for foreign investors so far this year.
The stock market’s Kospi index has rebounded around 30%,
its upward climb almost mirroring the strengthening of
the won, a double bonus for investors. "There’s been
some quick and easy money out of the Korean capital
markets," says Lee. The bond market has been nicely
buoyant too.
Lee
continues: "At the end of last year, the problem we had
was to stabilize foreign exchange markets as fast as we
could. After the Lehman collapse, the Korean government
was not ready to deal with any panic situation, and that
resulted in some chaos toward the end of last year.
However, that stabilized after the currency swap
agreement between Korea and the US, which helped
stabilize our exchange rate.
"Then we
turned attention to the domestic financial sector; we
had to make our banking sector stronger and healthier,
we had propped up our BIS [risk-bearing capital and the
risk-weighted asset] ratios and that happened. That was
the second stage. Right now we are in the third stage of
recovery, where we need to restructure our corporate
sector. It will take time, it can be painful because it
can generate unemployment – that is something we need to
do.
"We need
to do this to get into the next stage of revitalizing
domestic demand, consumption and investment. Without
restructuring the corporate sector, it will be very
difficult to expect consumers to spend more and
companies to invest more." Lee says the Korean
government has done much to assist in the restructuring
of the corporate sector, largely by generating jobs in
the public sector and securing social safety nets.
The
stresses on the Korean won were evident in September
last year when the spread on the government’s forex
stabilization bond rose from 150 basis points in late
August to almost 600bp after the Lehman collapse. Then,
through September and October, the Bank of Korea chewed
up almost $50 billion of its $260 billion reserves pile
trying to defend the won. But by October 30, Seoul and
Washington agreed a currency-swap deal that immediately
sent the bond spreads tumbling back toward 300bp. That
eased pressure on the local banks and by January Korean
banks had successfully rolled over billions of dollars
of foreign debt exposure. Since then, the economy has
resumed accumulating current-account surpluses, further
stabilizing local-currency markets. Foreign reserves
evened out at about $200 billion in December and January
and have now edged up towards $220 billion.
"The
crisis here is nothing like it was in the 1990s.
There’s been a whole slew of measures introduced
and I think this is what is helping keep the
economy out of recession so far"
David Edwards, SC
First Bank |
|
"Reserves have been
sufficient" to fight this struggle, says Lee, a far cry
from the 1990s’ crisis when the economy effectively ran
out of money. He says that even the lowest point of the
reserve tally – $200 billion in November/December last
year – still outstripped by $50 billion South Korea’s
total short-term foreign debt. "That’s a big difference
than the situation we had 10 years ago," he notes. In
1996, Korean corporate debt peaked at 400% of equity.
Today it is around 100%. "This crisis is much milder
than we had in 1997/98," he says, adding that consumers
and business inherently understand that, and this has
led to a relative shoring up of confidence levels.
Kim Jin-kyung, chief
financial officer of the Export-Import Bank of Korea,
describes the market reaction to the spreads of Korean
bonds in the immediate aftermath of the Lehman collapse
as "extreme". He says that Korean paper has been
"unfairly treated" by the market.
"When we
did the first issue out of Korea in January, it was also
to show the world that funding was available for Korean
issuers, it was just a matter of pricing," Kim says. "At
that time, money was very expensive for us but we did
manage to make quite a sizeable issue, and since then
the spread has come down considerably.
Money
available
"If we
can pay the price, there is money available for us. The
availability problem has now completely disappeared." He
says market conditions for Korean issuers in US dollars
have eased, but that euro and samurai bonds remain
"comparatively expensive for us, so for the time being
we are focused on the dollar side."
Despite
on-off policy initiatives such as the currency-swap
deals, bank deposit guarantees and last November’s $11
billion government stimulus package, Lee acknowledges
that a "much healthier corporate and banking sector" –
more influential than direct government action – has
enabled Seoul to keep game-changing foreign gremlins at
bay from substantially destabilizing the economy during
this crisis. He says the average capital adequacy ratios
in Korea – between 12% and 13% – are much higher than in
fellow OECD member states. As for the government, Lee
said it had panicked at the onset of the crisis but now
is "heading toward the right direction".
And in
perhaps the most ringing endorsement of all, the world
economy’s current Dr Doom, Professor Nouriel Roubini of
New York University – one of the few economists who
predicted the financial crisis and who is notorious for
his residual pessimism – thinks the Korean economy will
outperform most forecasts in 2009/10. "The latest
economic indicators suggest there is the beginning of an
economic recovery and growth might be already positive
in the second quarter,’’ he says.
Against
this comparatively buoyant backdrop, South Korean
bankers still have their reputations intact and have
begun launching financial products that remain years
away from reappearing in the west, if they ever surface
again.
That’s
evident in the first covered bond launched in Asia since
the financial crisis. HSBC and Citibank have helped
South Korea’s biggest private bank, Kookmin, arrange a
$1 billion bond covered by its mortgage and credit card
portfolio. It’s a structure that might send chills
through Wall Street and the City of London but the
Korean version comprises anything but the overleveraged
Deadbeat dad or ghetto loans packaged into the US
nightmare.
Kookmin’s
mortgages are solid Korean middle class; few Koreans owe
their bank more than 50% of the conservative value of
their homes, a regulation instituted after the 1998
crisis. Dr Lee Sang-che, research fellow at the Korean
Institute of Finance, notes: "The Korean mortgage sector
is one of the healthiest in the world, with small volume
and low delinquency ratios, below 1%. Its loan-to-value
(of the property) ratio is around 40%."
More to
the point, the five-year Kookmin facility was six times
oversubscribed. About 55% of it was taken up by Asian
investors – further evidence, if any were needed besides
China’s huge continued flotation of the US economy, that
the future indeed tilts eastwards.
|
"I think
the success of this bond shows there’s a good
appetite for this type of product out there if
structured properly"
Will Ross,
HSBC |
A year in the
construction, the Kookmin bond has been a triumph for
HSBC’s bonds team in Hong Kong and its Citibank
colleagues who joined them for the ride. "I think the
success of this bond shows there’s a good appetite for
this type of product out there if structured properly,"
says Will Ross, HSBC’s Hong Kong-based head of
asset-backed securities and structured bonds for
Asia-Pacific, who led the Kookmin mandate. "It is
perhaps a blueprint for what is possible in the future.
As a house we felt it important to get a deal like this
away if nothing else but to help reopen the credit
markets in Asia."
ING and Barclays Capital had
an early mandate from Kookmin Bank – in which ING holds
a direct 5% shareholding – to execute the covered bond.
Although ING didn’t eventually carry the Kookmin deal to
the end, Plag tips his cap to competitors HSBC and
Citibank for getting the issue away. "It was very well
received," he says. Plag notes that the Kookmin bond had
a large credit card element to the structure. "Credit
cards have a great record here in Korea," he says,
noting cardholders’ low delinquency levels. "People here
always pay their monthly bills when their salary comes
in. It’s much stricter here." Plag interprets this as a
legacy of the 1999 to 2002 credit card binge in South
Korea, when issued credit cards doubled, a boom that
ended in tears in 2003 in billion-dollar bailouts for a
host of issuers. "They were handing out credit cards for
free and people were paying their debts of one with
another." Plag says US credit bingers that contributed
to the current crisis could learn a lesson from Korea.
"I think people learnt their lesson then."
Plag also
notes a keener pricing for the Kookmin bond compared
with similar eurobonds issued in Eastern European
markets. "Everything has its price and, rightly or
wrongly, Korea is still seen as an emerging market and
that comes at a price. It [the Kookmin bond pricing]
could have been much worse. It was a decent price, and
there was solid interest and it was well received."
While
acknowledging the success of the Kookmin package,
Standard Chartered’s Edwards says: "I don’t have any
plans to do a covered bond but I would like to do some
more RMBS [residential mortgage-backed securities]."
Permanently
penalized
Cho
Syeung-hyun, chief of the global funding team at
state-owned Korean Development Bank, says Korean paper
has in recent years been more keenly priced in the
market than issues from the Philippines, long regarded
as a southeast-Asian basket-case economy. "The ongoing
North Korea nuclear impasse is a constant problem for
Korean issuers that perennially overhangs the market’s
view of Korea," Cho says. "South Korea is permanently
penalized by geopolitical reasons in how it is rated, so
don’t tell us we have to pay more compared with other
single-A issues." Based on the relative health and size
of the economy, Cho says, "we should be at least
double-A. We continue to educate investors."
The
market has also been buoyed up by the winning of a
long-standing investor campaign to have a withholding
tax on won-denominated Korean bonds lifted, a further
sign that the government is listening more closely to
the market. While welcoming the relaxation, Adam McCabe,
fixed-income portfolio manager at Aberdeen Asset
Management, wonders if it will have any impact on
improving liquidity and foreign participation in the won
market. "I don’t think it will have a dramatic impact in
the short term," he says. "It doesn’t immediately drive
foreign capital into the market." McCabe says further
education and selling of policy needs to be made by the
authorities to widen the appeal of Korean bonds, with
the resultant impact on liquidity.
"The
liquidity of the domestic bond market is quite
disappointing," he says, noting a succession of "fire
sales" of Korea-related bonds in recent months in
response to the financial crisis buffeting from abroad,
which might have affected foreign "comfort levels"
toward the local Korean capital markets. "We need to
undergo another round of education so foreign investors
can better understand the local market."
McCabe agrees that the
Korean market had been unfairly treated internationally.
"A lot of people didn’t fully appreciate the nature of
the risks in the local financial system. Those [Korean]
issuers that have come to market in the past six months
have done a fantastic job in educating the international
investing community. Korea does get an unfair press
sometimes."